Cava v. Cava (200 So. 2d 583, 1967)

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an or-er denying defendant’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings. It appearing that the complaint stated a cause of action, and the defendant had no benefit of any admissions of the facts alleged in his answer, the motion was properly denied. See Paradise Pools, Inc. v. Genauer, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 860.

We express no opinion upon the validity of the grounds given by the circuit judge for the order denying the motion.

Affirmed.