Sharretts v. State (203 So. 2d XLI, 1967)

PER CURIAM.

Following his trial and conviction for robbery the appellant prosecuted an appeal to this court, and we affirmed. See Shar-retts v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 41. Subsequently he filed a motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1. His present appeal is from an order of the trial court summarily denying the motion. No basis to disturb the trial court’s ruling has been shown on this appeal. Moreover, the validity and admissibility of the confession and the matter of advice of right .to counsel were considered and determined on the earlier appeal.

Affirmed.