McKinzy v. State (209 So. 2d 701, 1968)

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.

Affirmed.