Kerr v. Kerr (219 So. 2d 117, 1969)

PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs have been thoroughly reviewed and it is the opinion of this court that the appellant has failed, to make error clearly appear. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of Pendleton v. Pendleton, Fla. App.1966, 189 So.2d 499, and Tanner v. Tanner, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 702.

Affirmed.

CROSS, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.