Jones v. State (262 So. 2d 249, 1972)

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs filed in this cause. We are of the opinion that the prosecutor’s statements concerning the defendant’s previous criminal activity were properly admitted under the rule enunciated in Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The remainder of defendant’s arguments are equally without merit. We therefore,

Affirm.

WALDEN, MAGER and OWEN, JJ., concur.