Mays v. State (314 So. 2d 154, 1975)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting) :

Appellant’s conviction should be reversed and the case remanded for re-trial. The evidence seized pursuant to an invalid search should be suppressed. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). This matter was preserved for our consideration and the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress manifestly constituted reversible error.

I do, therefore, dissent.