Anderson v. State (314 So. 2d 595, 1975)

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been .clearly demonstrated. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting) :

I respectfully dissent because of the trial error in refusing to order the State to reveal the identity of the confidential informant. Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957) and Spataro v. State, 179 So.2d 873 (2d DCA Fla.1965).

I would reverse and remand for a new trial.