Wing v. Norton Co. (319 So. 2d 98, 1975)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, C. J., dissents with opinion.

WALDEN, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

Under the facts of this case it is my opinion that Norton Company was involved with interstate and intrastate transactions so that the state is empowered to require Norton to qualify to do business. I would reverse upon authority of Eli Lilly and Company v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc., 366 U.S. 276, 81 S.Ct. 1316, 6 L.Ed.2d 288 (1961).

I do, therefore, dissent.