Thomas v. Kramer (356 So. 2d 320, 1977)

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the briefs of the parties and the appendix and find that appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of the wide judicial discretion with which the chancellor is vested in matters of this kind. Lane v. Clein, 137 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1962); 17 Fla.Jur., Injunction, § 16.

Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed.

CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.