Citations
- 364 So. 2d 554
Full opinion text
PER CURIAM.
Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, the final order is affirmed.
MILLS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
BOYER, Acting C. J., concurs specially.
BOYER, Acting Chief Judge,
concurring specially.
I concur in affirmance but only because of the language of Slaughter v. State ex rel. Harrell, 245 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971) wherein this court stated:
“Mandamus is a harsh and extraordinary remedy. It is available to enforce a legal right that has already been clearly established, but not to establish a legal right. * * * ” (245 So.2d at page 128)