Citations
- 369 So. 2d 386
Full opinion text
PER CURIAM.
The revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed, but we remand for deletion of the finding of violation of the condition requiring payment of costs of supervision from the order of revocation. Appellant did not admit this violation, and there was no evidence to show that appellant was able to pay the costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.