Jacobs v. Jacobs (377 So. 2d 251, 1979)

PER CURIAM.

We disagree with the wife’s contention that the lower court erred in awarding her rehabilitative, rather than permanent alimony. Under the circumstances demonstrated in the record, that determination was a proper exercise of the discretion of the trial judge, with which we may not interfere. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Since the appellant’s other point also lacks merit, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

. We note that the judgment, which provided for two years of rehabilitative alimony at $750 per month, is, upon a proper showing, subject to modification under Sec. 61.14, Fla.Stat. (1977).