Citations
- 377 So. 2d 166
Full opinion text
PER CURIAM.
We find appellants’ constitutional argument to be without merit. See City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 421 U.S. 297, 96 S.Ct. 2513, 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641, 86 S.Ct. 1717, 16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966); Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Co., 296 So.2d 9 (Fla.1974); Winner v. Westwood, 273 So.2d 151 (Fla.1970); Rodriquez v. Jones, 64 So.2d 278 (Fla.1953). We have also reviewed the other issues raised by appellants and find them to be without merit.
The order of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDonald, JJ., concur.