Harlow v. State (385 So. 2d 734, 1980)

PER CURIAM.

Hearsay testimony was all that supported the violation of the monthly support condition. Also, there was no specific finding that appellant’s financial condition would allow him to pay the supervisory fee condition. Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Therefore, we remand for the deletion of both those violated conditions on the order of revocation of probation. In all other respects, we affirm.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.