Flynn v. Flynn (390 So. 2d 1252, 1980)

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record and briefs in this case, particularly considering the financial position of the parties, we determine that the trial judge’s award was within his broad scope of discretion and cannot be classified as unreasonable or arbitrary. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

McCORD, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.