Lunford v. State (412 So. 2d 912, 1982)

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Williams v. State, 405 So.2d 436 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

MILLS and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

SHAW, J., dissents with opinion.

SHAW, Judge,

dissenting.

The appellants successfully attacked illegal sentences and upon being resentenced were given what I view as more severe sentences. It is my opinion that North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969) is applicable. See dissent in Adams v. State, 414 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).