Alderman v. State (417 So. 2d 699, 1982)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alderman’s single general sentence for two separate offenses is improper, Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977), and is therefore vacated and remanded to the trial court with directions to enter a separate sentence for each offense. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.

Appellant’s remaining arguments being without merit, the judgment and sentence is otherwise affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.