Yarish v. State (420 So. 2d 649, 1982)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Yarish’s convictions and sentences for grand theft, dealing in stolen property and violation of probation. However, we do so without prejudice to his right to seek relief via rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief demonstrating that a manifest injustice occurred because the trial court failed to establish a factual basis for his pleas. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.