Lanham v. State (429 So. 2d 1374, 1983)

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record and the contentions of the parties we are of the view that all of the appellants are entitled to a judgment in their favor upon the state’s claim of forfeiture and upon the state’s assessment of storage charges. See U.S. v. Lace, 502 F.Supp. 1021 (D.Vt.1980); aff’d 669 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.1982); Bloom v. State, 283 So.2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); and § 933.14, Fla.Stat. (1979). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand with directions for entry of judgment in favor of appellants.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.