Mitchell v. State (433 So. 2d 68, 1983)

PER CURIAM.

During closing argument, the prosecutor impermissibly commented on the defendant’s exercise of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. The error was preserved for appellate review and, thus, we reverse. See Donovan v. State, 417 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1982); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla. 1978); Shannon v. State, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1976); Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1975).

REVERSED & REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

HERSEY, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.