Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc. (447 So. 2d 228, 1983)

PER CURIAM.

As to the dismissal of Count II of appellant’s complaint, we cannot find that the argument raised by appellant was preserved for appeal. In any event, as to both Count I and Count II, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determinations, which are entitled to a presumption of correctness. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.