Cox v. State (506 So. 2d 53, 1987)

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court’s failure to exclude defendant’s post-Miranda statement used by the state to rebut defendant’s insanity defense falls within the prohibitions of Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284, 106 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986), and State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 931, 104 S.Ct. 1719, 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.