Seoane v. Seoane (514 So. 2d 430, 1987)

PER CURIAM.

Agreeing with the trial court that appellant’s prior actions, in and out of court, are inconsistent with his current position that appellee is not entitled to relief, we affirm the Order Declaring that Husband is Es-topped from Denying the Validity of his Dominican Divorce. See Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So.2d 739 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Clagett v. King, 308 A.2d 245 (D.C.App. 1973); Mayer v. Mayer, 66 N.C.App. 522, 311 S.E.2d 659, review denied, 311 N.C. 760, 321 S.E.2d 140 (1984).

Affirmed.