Smith v. State (528 So. 2d 1377, 1988)

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in admitting hearsay testimony contradicting appellant’s statements to police about his place of residence. However, we believe the admission of such testimony was harmless and affirm appellant’s conviction.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

I agree that hearsay evidence was erroneously admitted, but I cannot agree that its admission was harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).