Crooms v. State (543 So. 2d 415, 1989)

PER CURIAM.

Having concluded that the matters presented herein are controlled by Gipson v. State, 537 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Walker v. State, 514 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987) and that defendants’ motion to suppress should have been granted, we reverse.

NIMMONS, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.