Arnold v. State (572 So. 2d 1026, 1991)

LETTS, Judge.

We reverse and remand for a new trial. The reasons given by the prosecutor to justify the exercise of the peremptory challenge of a black juror are not supported anywhere in the record. See State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984); Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1990).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, J., concurs.

WARNER, J., concurs specially with opinion.

WARNER, Judge,

concurs specially.

I concur in the reversal. However, on retrial I believe it would be error to admit the contents of a BOLO which described the defendant based on State v. Baird, 572 So.2d 904 (Fla.1990), and Harris v. State, 544 So.2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).