Douglas v. State (578 So. 2d 52, 1991)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends his sentencing as an habitual offender was invalid because it was based on two prior convictions of the same date. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As the second supplemental record shows, this was not the case.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.