Tardif v. State (589 So. 2d 1040, 1991)

PER CURIAM.

We reverse based on the authorities of Amado v. State, 585 So.2d 282 (Fla.1991) and Essex v. State, 539 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

We find that the remaining points raised by the defendants lack merit.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.