J.R. v. State (592 So. 2d 1253, 1992)

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in ordering her to pay restitution for damages that were not proven to be directly or indirectly related to the offenses to which she pleaded guilty. § 775.089(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Williams, 520 So.2d 276 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for further proceedings consistent with section 775.-089(l)(a).

FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.