Citations
- 597 So. 2d 987
Full opinion text
PER CURIAM.
We dismiss this appeal as the order sought to be reviewed is a nonfinal, nonap-pealable order.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.
ANSTEAD, Judge,
concurring specially.
I would not dismiss the appeal, but would affirm the order on review. I disagree that we lack jurisdiction to review a juvenile dependency review order that provides for custody of the appellant’s child to remain with the state. See In Interest of M.A., 593 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). However, I find no prejudicial error has been demonstrated on appeal.