Fielding v. Cerrato (599 So. 2d 274, 1992)

Florida District Court of Appeal 1992-05-29

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

GRIFFIN, J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.

GRIFFIN, Judge,-

concurring specially.

I agree that the final judgment based on the jury verdict in this case should be affirmed. I write only to express my disagreement with the lower court’s ruling that the amount of compensation paid to an expert witness to testify in a medical malpractice case, or any case for that matter, is “irrelevant”. See, e.g., Langston v. King, 410 So.2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).