Savas v. Smith (606 So. 2d 515, 1992)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court which dismissed the amended complaint filed by John Savas because Mr. Savas had not alleged, and could not by further amendment allege, a cause of action. See Quinn v. Stone, 259 So.2d 492 (Fla.1972); see also Duke v. Smith, 784 F.Supp. 865 (S.D.Fla.1992).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.