Oropesa v. State (606 So. 2d 1289, 1992)

PER CURIAM.

Finding a valid departure reason supported by the record, Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986), Rey v. State, 509 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written sentence to comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing that the terms be served concurrently. Perez v. State, 498 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.