Kapala v. State (610 So. 2d 741, 1993)

Florida District Court of Appeal 1993-01-13

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

We treat the order on appeal as summarily denying appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and affirm.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

While it appears that appellant’s pending motion for post-conviction relief may be without merit, it also appears that he may be able to amend the petition to state a claim under our recent decision in Hassoun v. State, 609 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).