Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the mother, challenges the order terminating her parental rights to J.M., T.M., C.O. and M.O. and placing them in the custody of appellee, the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS). We find that HRS has proved by clear and convincing evidence the need for termination of parental rights in this case. See § 39.464(5), Fla.Stat. (1991); Padgett v. Dep’t of H.R.S., 577 So.2d 565 (Fla.1991). We affirm.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.