James v. State (620 So. 2d 1227, 1993)

PER CURIAM.

We have for review James v. State, 613 So.2d 25 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), on the ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). The district court’s decision is quashed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.