Davis v. State (622 So. 2d 145, 1993)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s argument with respect to issue one is without merit. See Salas v. State, 589 So.2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Issues two and three are not cognizable on motion for relief from an illegal sentence. See Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and MINER, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.