Vereen v. State (637 So. 2d 386, 1994)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to resubmit the Rule 3.850 motion with the proper oath. See Van Tassell v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

. We note that the order denying the 3.850 motion is also insufficient. A copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that Vereen is entitled to no relief is not attached to the order as required by Rule 3.850(d).