Howard v. State (638 So. 2d 213, 1994)

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes, and we find, that it was error for the trial court to refuse to conduct an inquiry to determine whether, when the state used peremptory challenges to exclude women from the jury, it was acting in an impermissibly discriminatory manner. J.E.B. v. Alabama ex reí. T.B., — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994); Laidler v. State, 627 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); State v. Neil, 467 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984); State v. Johans, 613 So.2d 1319 (Fla.1993).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., and SMITH, FREDRICKA G., Associate Judge, concur.