Shaw v. State (650 So. 2d 143, 1995)

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Nathamel D. Shaw appeals the summary deMal of Ms timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the order except for Mr. Shaw’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Mr. Shaw pleaded no contest to trafficking in cocaine. Pursuant to a written plea agreement, he received an eighteen-year sentence of incarceration as a habitual offender, with ten years suspended. Contrary to his sworn motion, the attachments to the order establish that he received notice of an enhanced penalty and was informed in writing that his status as a habitual offender would affect gain time.

The defendant claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because Ms lawyer failed to investigate Ms claim that the drugs found in Ms car were planted there by the police. His sworn allegations unequivocally state that the drugs were not Ms, that the police placed the drugs in his ear, and that he advised Ms lawyer of these facts. He maintains that he would not have pleaded no contest if Ms lawyer had done the proper investigation to prove these facts.

If these sworn allegations are true, Mr. Shaw would appear entitled to relief under the standards relating to ineffective assistance of counsel. Jones v. State, 627 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). On the other hand, if these sworn allegations are proven to be false on remand, they would seem to present a proper basis for a charge of perjury in an official proceeding. § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LAZZARA, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.