Roblyer v. Roblyer (651 So. 2d 107, 1995)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the appellant’s first three issues finding them to be without merit. We decline to review the fourth issue since it is a nonappealable nonfinal order pursuant to McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and QUINCE, JJ., concur.