Darman v. Berkowitz (652 So. 2d 1287, 1995)

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the cross-appeal or the second point on direct appeal. We find error, however, in the trial court’s refusal to allow the jury to consider the issue of future medical expenses regardless of whether there was evidence to support a finding that a permanent injury was sustained. We reverse and remand for retrial on this issue only, which retrial should be guided by the supreme court’s rationale in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.