Huffine v. State (655 So. 2d 103, 1995)

SHAW, Judge.

We have for review Hujfine v. State, 648 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), wherein the district court certified:

Is section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), facially unconstitutional as vague and overbroad?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently upheld the constitutionality of the ansi-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly S186, — So.2d(Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Hujfine on this issue.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

KOGAN, J.,

specially concurring.

Subject to the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly S186, — So.2d-[1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995) (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with the majority.