Simmons v. State (662 So. 2d 745, 1995)

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of both armed robbery and theft for a single taking. Although we reject his challenges to the armed robbery conviction, which we affirm without further elaboration, we must reverse the theft conviction on the authority of Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994). We remand the case for resentencing.

BOOTH, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.