M.C.D. v. State (675 So. 2d 949, 1996)

PER CURIAM.

In each of the above cases, we find that there was not reasonable suspicion which would justify searching appellant. See In the Interest of A.J.M., 617 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The orders of adjudication and commitment are reversed, and the cases are remanded to the trial court to enter orders granting the motions to suppress.

WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concurring.

LAWRENCE, J., dissenting with written opinion.

LAWRENCE, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The school officer’s justification for searching the student was based upon reasonable suspicion that he was in possession of unlawful drugs. Accordingly, I would affirm denial of the motion to suppress and further affirm the adjudication of delinquency and commitment.