Currelly v. State (678 So. 2d 453, 1996)

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the award of a public defender fee for which there was neither notice nor oral pronouncement. Wright v. State, 654 So.2d 252 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that a public defender’s lien is improperly imposed without notice and an opportunity to object); Trueblood v. State, 635 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (“It is well-settled that the oral pronouncement of a sentence prevails over the written judgment and sentence form.”).

We also strike and thus reverse that portion of appellant’s sentence, to-wit: “any sentence received for violation of controlled release in 90-4107-CF,” which purports to require his sentence to be consecutive to an undetermined future sentence. Imposition of a sentence consecutive to an undetermined future sentence is error. Lyons v. State, 672 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (holding that a sentence cannot be imposed consecutive to an undetermined future sentence).

We affirm in all other respects.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.