Haimowitz v. Haimowitz (68 So. 2d 588, 1953)

PER CURIAM.'

The record and briefs in this cause have been examined and the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of Bailey v. Smith, 89 Fla. 303, 103 So. 833; Lippman v. Shapiro, 151 Fla. 327, 9 So.2d 636; Ake v. Chancey, 152 Fla. 677, 13 So.2d 6; Knapp v. Fredrickson, 148 Fla. 311, 4 So.2d 251 and Sapir v. Sapir, Fla., 53 So.2d 925.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING aud MATHEWS, JJ., concur.