Paston v. Wiggs Contracting Co. (698 So. 2d 933, 1997)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment as to all Appellees except with respect to a post-judgment discovery order involving only Appel-lee-Sasser’s Glass Works, Inc. The trial court denied Appellant’s motion for protective order, which alleged that Sasser’s subpoena duces tecum and request for production improperly sought records protected by attorney-client and work product privileges. We do not consider or address the merits, but reverse that discovery order and remand for the trial court to conduct an in camera inspection of the items in question before determining whether the claimed privileges apply. See Paskoski v. Johnson, 626 So.2d 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). In all other respects, we affirm.

STONE, C.J., and POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.