A.V. v. State (706 So. 2d 945, 1998)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm based on the authority of D.P. v. State, 705 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

COPE and GODERICH, JJ., concur.

GREEN, J., dissents.

■GREEN, Judge,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in my dissent in D.P. v. State, 705 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), I would reverse the order withholding adjudication of delinquency and placing the appellant in a community control program based upon my belief that Dade County Ordinance 88-113, Section 21-30.01(e) is facially unconstitutional and would accordingly certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance:

IS DADE COUNTY ORDINANCE 88-113, SECTION ■ 21-30.01(e) FACIALLY CONSTITUTIONAL?