Bodkin v. State (708 So. 2d 1047, 1998)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. With regard to Appellant’s claim that his sentence is illegal, see Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1197 (Fla.1995), and Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994). As to all other claims, Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief was untimely filed.

STONE, C.J., and GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.